Thursday 29 May 2014

15 points effect of Modi’s Victory

 Modi’s Victory


1.        Congress now not even opposition party with less than 50 seats

2.        Opposition party need coalition to form opposition party

3.        Those who counted Modi as untouchable now either acknowledge his power and persona or their suffering from anti modi pain is at peak

4.        Almost entire media who use to be fabricating news and news item against Modi is now singing songs of Modi for the sake of TRP they need. WOW!

5.        Nitish Kumar biting the dust for his ego

6.        Jamat of day dreamer of becoming PM like Nitish Kumar, Mulayam, Mayavati, Jayalalitha, Mamta, Sharad Pawar are now facing cruel reality and they need to understand their size in Indian politics now

7.        Population of political party in India is greatly cut to size by Mr. Modi and now DMK, BSP wont be there and many other parties have only one or two seats

8.        AAP and Aravind Kejariwal realized that throwing tantrum like visiting gujarat for couple of days and singing anti gujarat songs wont help them. Taking sample from Sabarmati to prove its populated back fired them. Nautanki for 49 days in delhi and marketing it as good government against proven track racord of good governance of Mr Modi was there for all voters

9.        Rahul Gandhi is still toddler in politics rather helped modi to win atleast 150 more seats

10.     Low level politics by congress and using all machinery like CBI etc against Modi did not help them as people are really not fool and congress need to realize sooner if they want to survive any more in politics

11.     All the leaders who used to do daily aarti of rahul baba and sonia mai need to realise that “Ye public hai sab janti hai” and you can not win people without doing actual work for them

12.     Poor people now realised that congress used them badly and congress is only responsible for their current state of finance

13.     Caste card users like Mayawati, Mulayam and Lalu witnessed that Voters are really not fool that they can use as they want them now

14.     So called sick secularism lost badly as it was sickularism rather secularism. Even Muslim community realised that they are not there to be used for appeasement and not doing anything for them. You cant win votes by scaring them of Modi and rather need to do something for harmony of all caste

15.     All parties use to fight against each other and joining hands after election saying we would come together to stop secular party BJP. ( Are we fucking fool you morons??) Now they can join hands just to form opposition as even congress does not qualify as opposition party for the seats they got. People does not forget nor forgive, see the results of AAP in delhi after Arvind kejarival did item song by trying to meet modi without appointment with his favorite news channel crew to make tamasha. People gave him verdict to learn now.

Monday 26 May 2014

Modi India-fied

Clear mandate: With 282 seats in the Lok Sabha, 
the BJP and Narendra Modi have a free hand
Critics and supporters alike acknowledge Narendra Modi's ability to focus. On May 13, the day after the end of a nearly year-long gruelling campaign - covering 300,000 km, 5,187 events and direct interaction with 234 million people - Modi was back in Gujarat, chairing a meeting to review the water situation in the state.
After its high-decibel campaign, the Bharatiya Janata Party now needs to deliver on its promise -acche din aane wale hain (better days are ahead) - to keep the faith of those who identified with Modi's politics of hope. This includes Sunita Singh, a resident of Veerganj village in Amethi, Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi's constituency in Uttar Pradesh. Singh, who had never even heard of Smriti Irani, her local BJP candidate, is hoping Modi will bring jobs to Amethi. "Humne Modi ji ko suna hai TV par (I have heard Modi ji on TV)," she said, adding that even her 12-year-old son had asked her to vote for the BJP on the party's development agenda. Gandhi eventually defeated Irani, but with what would be considered a wafer thin margin in the Gandhi bastion - of 107,000 votes. In 2009, Gandhi had won with a margin of 370,000 votes.
Modi's critics say he may have over-committed. "The new government comes in with extreme expectations," says Jagannadham Thunuguntla, Head of Research and Chief Strategist at SMC Global Securities, an investment advisory firm.
In the corridors of power in Delhi, there is a sense of panic, understated as of now, though, as Modi, an outsider, is expected to unsettle the status quo by replacing largesse with efficiency and loyalty with talent. A leaner cabinet, accountable bureaucrats and a reformed Prime Minister's Office (PMO) will be the cornerstone of his political management in Delhi, say those who have worked with him. The UPA government had 82 secretaries and around 80 ministers; Modi's cabinet is expected to be two-thirds the size. His team is likely to be a mix of bureaucrats, technocrats and politicians. In March 2013, an alternative budget prepared for India Today magazine by economists Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari suggested scrapping 31 ministries and restructuring others into a dozen major ministries, saving Rs 1.5 lakh crore.
IMMEDIATE AGENDA

-Empower the Prime Minister's Offi ce with more direct involvement in decision-making
-Restructure key ministries such as fi nance, external affairs, energy, infrastructure
-Strengthen relations with the US
-Empower bureaucrats and technocrats to enable faster decision-making
-Flexible policy on FDI
-Tax reforms to include roadmap for GST and DTC
-Increase involvement of chief ministers in decisionmaking, include them in Cabinet Committee on Security and in natural resource allocation decisions
-Greater thrust on agriculture, manufacturing and infrastructure
-Greater trade engagement with Japan, South Korea, China and Southeast Asia
Business leaders are hopeful that quick decision-making will replace the policy inaction that weighed down the second avatar of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance coalition government (UPA-II). Chanda Kochhar, Managing Director and CEO of ICICI Bank, says: "What Narendra Modi under the new government will do immediately is to take existing pending projects and make sure that they become productive. Modi can do it... he ran a state and is aware about what it takes to make projects happen."
Corporate India's sentiments were echoed on the stock markets, and the BSE Sensex touched a lifetime high of 25,375 on May 16, the day of the election results. Others believe that with a majority verdict, Modi will initiate reforms. Adi Godrej, Chairman of the Godrej Group, says: "He will work on restoring investor confidence and address manufacturing issues."
Under Modi, India's federal structure may be at the cusp of change. The traditional model of instructions to states needs to evolve into a partnership, and Modi has on several occasions suggested greater devolution of power. "States are important. And real-time functioning should have the PM and the CMs of the states working in tandem. The federal structure is important in letter and spirit. It is our strength," he said at one of the 477 rallies he addressed.
A senior BJP leader says: "Now that the BJP has a majority in the Lok Sabha, it will put pressure on chief ministers of other parties to perform. Now there is a good chance that this idea of a PM-CM committee will work."
Modi is also likely to build a more powerful PMO, addressing the concerns of Manmohan Singh's critics. Sanjaya Baru, former media advisor to Singh, notes in his book, The Accidental Prime Minister, that "even with its combined strength of T.K.A. Nair and Pulok Chatterjee, [the PMO] was not a patch on the magisterial Brajesh Mishra who ran Vajpayee's PMO with great aplomb".
Full Coverage: Lok Sabha Elections 2014
Congress President Sonia Gandhi's National Advisory Council - which ran parallel to the cabinet - is likely to be dismantled. Frequent disagreements on important issues led to delays and dilution of the PMO's power. A few days before election results were announced, BJP leaders huddled to ensure that senior party colleagues, such as L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and Sushma Swaraj, would be satisfied with the formation of a new government, and to persuade Rajnath Singh to join the cabinet. (This was before Business Today went to press Saturday night.) A senior leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, who did not want to be named, says: "All this is to avoid evolution of two power centres in the government."
Yashwant Sinha, BJP leader and former finance minister
The starting point should be to balance the budget, control inflation and create infrastructure by clearing pending projects: Yashwant Sinha, BJP leader and former finance minister
An empowered bureaucracy makes for swift decisions and action, and Modi has arecord of empowering bureaucrats. For example, the Gujarat Chief Minister's Office is run by a core group of officials, including Chief Principal Secretary Kuniyil Kailashanathan, whose post was specifically created for him. Modi is expected to codify the roles of decision-makers and set clear expectations of them. Suresh Prabhu, who was the power minister in the former BJP led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government, says: "Codification means that any interference stops."
Key ministries, such as finance, commerce, home, and the railways, are likely to get a new structure. Modi has also talked of restructuring the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), which will work closely with the commerce ministry. The Directorate General of Foreign Trade is expected to be withdrawn from the commerce ministry and merged with the MEA. Restoring institutional credibility is likely to be at the top of the new government's agenda. Besides the PMO, this would include the Interstate Council and the Cabinet Committee on Security. Measures are likely to include the setting up of a transparent mechanism to grant clearances, and possibly a project monitoring system directly overseen by the Prime Minister. Something similar was introduced last year, headed by Chatterjee, the Principal Secretary to the PM.
Illustrations By Ajay Thakuri

"For many actions that require inter-departmental clearance, coordination has to happen through the PMO, which has not been happening. A decisive, well-functioning PMO has to come to action in 30 days," says a close aide of Modi.
The new government will have about 60 days to put together its first budget, in which major announcements are expected relating to the streamlining of processes for small and medium enterprises, river interlinking, rural roads, and supply-side constraints. A July budget could set out a timeline for the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Direct Tax Code (DTC). Stressed assets of banks, the pricing of agricultural produce, and direct cash transfers could also find a place in the budget.
Stressed loans total $100 billion, or 10 per cent of all loans. An economist who does not want to be named suggests reduction of the government's stake in banks, so that they can raise equity. Some weaker banks, he says, could be merged with strong ones. (The recently released report of the RBI-appointed P.J. Nayak committee has also made similar recomm-endations.) Modi's advisors have also hinted at the reversal of water, fertiliser and power subsidies at a later stage. Scrapping a subsidy is a politically contentious decision. The July budget will have to account for additional subsidy payments of $16 billion.
"The starting point should be to balance the budget as much as one can - the number of supply-side measures to control inflation and create space for the Reserve Bank of India to start reducing interest rates, and create infrastructure by clearing all the pending projects and reviving the investmentcycle," says former finance minister and BJP leader Yashwant Sinha.
"The new finance minister will have to correct [UPA-II finance minister Palaniappan] Chidambaram's statistical jugglery," says economist Debroy. "The current account deficit [CAD] has been reduced through artificial means. He has not accounted for all the expenditure in the fiscal deficit. According to my calculation, the fiscal deficit is 5.2 per cent."
The Congress-led government, in an attempt to prune the fiscal deficit to 4.6 per cent for 2013/14, cut spending by $13 billion. Its interim budget sought to contain the fiscal deficit to 4.1 per cent for 2014/15, the lowest in seven years, but many consider this an unrealistic target.
The CAD was brought under control by nearly halving gold imports, which has revived gold smuggling. The BJP has promised to review gold import duties within three months of coming to power. Another way to keep the CAD in check is to increase manufacturing exports. Modi, who has been instrumental in diversifying Gujarat's manufacturing base away from petrochemicals, is expected to appoint a commission to boost manufacturing.
Chanda Kochhar, MD and CEO, ICICI Bank
Modi can do it. He ran a state and is aware of what it takes to make projects happen: Chanda Kochhar, MD and CEO, ICICI BankPhoto: Yasbant Negi
On the expenditure side, to fuel growth, the government would have to increase capital expenditure, which has shrunk to 1.7 per cent of GDP, from four per cent in 2003. "It's a tough task, but they need to do it to start rebuilding infrastructure," says the economist quoted earlier.
Economists question whether fiscal space is available for substantive reforms - as the tax-to-GDP ratio has slipped to 10.2 per cent from a peak of 12.5 per cent in 2007/08 and tax revenues are unlikely to recover immediately - but the new government is likely to take the opportunity to lay out its vision. A plan to tackle supplyside constraints, a key reason for spiralling inflation, is likely to be put into action almost immediately. Rajiv Kumar, Senior Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research, says: "It could be a combination of administrative and economic measures, from taking action on hoarders to setting up a task force on the APMC (Agriculture Produce Marketb Committee) Act. Supply-side constraints can be addressed without going to Parliament."
One of Modi's biggest achievements has been the revival of agriculture in Gujarat, and he is likely to replicate that nationwide. An International Food Policy Research Institute paper says that between 2000/01 and 2007/08, agricultural value added grew at 9.6 per cent a year in Gujarat - double the rate for India, and among the fastest rates recorded anywhere. Modi has proposed a market stabilisation fund for farmers to get the optimum price for their produce.
First-quarter subsidy payments are likely to be much higher than the year-ago quarter, but a Modi government is unlikely to change it. "We will not sell dreams," says BJP national treasurer Piyush Goyal. "The hard reality is government money is required to be spent in more targeted areas. Subsidies must benefit the poor, not fuel the SUVs of the rich."
Former minister Prabhu says: "Certain forms of subsidy are inevitable - 30-40 per cent of people are poor. Subsidies cannot be wished away in the foreseeable future." The BJP seems aligned with Congress thinking on welfare schemes. BJP leaders say their government will implement the right to food better, and BJP-ruled states have embraced the UPA's welfare schemes. A senior BJP leader who is close to Modi says UPA schemes such as the employment guarantee programme and Right to Education will continue.
Modi is likely to use the unique identity platform for better targeting. India's most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, which sent a record 73 lawmakers of the NDA to Parliament, may find some favour with the new Prime Minister. He is likely to take steps to boost the sugarcane industry, and may give UP's sugar mills incentives to clear their arrears of over Rs 7,500 crore.
The budget is likely to set a deadline for the implementation of two key tax reforms - the GST and DTC - which have been delayed due to lack of consensus among states. "In the next two years, expect GST and DTC to be in place," says Kutumba Rao, finance expert with the Telegu Desam Party, a BJP ally. "With GST, the GDP will go up by at least 1.5 to two percentage points without any effort by the government, and the DTC will improve compliance."
Sushil Modi, former finance minister of Bihar and ex-chairman of the empowered committee of state finance ministers on GST, says the BJP is committed to implementing the GST. "In my view, no state has opposed the GST in principle. States have specific concerns, and we will take care of those," he says.
Restarting mining would be another priority for the new government. Corruption and lack of transparency in coal block allocation, and lack of clearances have led to underutilisation of coal reserves, and the use of forex reserves to meet energy needs. Modi's aides who are working on a white paper on mining say he is keen on a model similar to Ultra Mega Power Projects, by which mining rights would be awarded as a package, with all clearances in place. This, they say, would reduce the time spent on getting permissions.
Setting up a coal regulator would be another priority for the new government. Modi has vehemently attacked the UPA government's inability to extract coal and give it to power generation companies. "The immediate priority is to institute a policy of transparent allocation of natural resources including that of coal," says Narendra Taneja, national convener of BJP's energy cell. "We must realise that if we don't commit to these reforms, India would have to import fuel worth $1.25 trillion by 2035 (oil, gas, coal and uranium)." A senior BJP leader says India must develop energy intelligence-gathering resources and reduce reaction time to convert acquisition leads into deals, as China and the US do. India spends $167 billion a year to import fuel.
The Supreme Court lifted the ban on mining in Goa in April, but licensing procedures could take 18 months before mining can resume. Expediting these would be a way for the new government to signal that it means business.
To facilitate clearances, Modi has spoken about using technology to make decision-making transparent - a system to track files across ministries. In Gujarat, for example, everything from the availability of plots of land to status of projects can be tracked online.
The new government is likely to continue oil decontrol, and restructure oil subsidies, which total Rs 1 lakh crore. The BJP's clear majority in the Lok Sabha will help its government take decisions that were stymied in the coalition government.
BJP sources say Modi intends to build a cross-country power grid. India is already connected with Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh under the SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) grid, and talks are on for partial connectivity with Sri Lanka and Pakistan. "The plan is to connect Myanmar and subsequently get into the ASEAN grid, and on the other side have connectivity with Central Asia," says BJP energy advisor Taneja. The new government is also expected to tweak clauses in the nuclear liability law to increase nuclear power generation in the country.

Mr Liability



On May 19, there was a procession outside the Congress office at 24, Akbar Road, New Delhi. A group of Youth Congress leaders was shouting slogans: 'Rahul tum sangharsh karo, hum tumhare saath hain (Rahul you struggle, we're with you)'. Inside the office, there was another group of 38 putting their heads together to find out what was behind their worst-ever showing in the General Elections, which reduced the Grand Old Party to a mere 44 seats in the 16th Lok Sabha. 
Sonia Gandhi with Rahul in New Delhi.
Congress Working Committee, the most powerful group of party leaders, was meeting in the presence of party President Sonia Gandhi and Vice-President Rahul Gandhi. The drama outside the office was not dissimilar to the melodrama inside-the objective of both the groups was to save Rahul.

The well-scripted theatrics started with Sonia offering to step down, only to be interrupted by outgoing prime minister Manmohan Singh. "Offering a resignation is not the solution. The party needs you much more than ever before," he said. Rahul, meanwhile, was peeping into his cell phone and taking notes on a piece of paper. He was the third to speak. "I feel that there is no accountability in the party and perhaps I couldn't do what was expected. I start with holding myself responsible for the poor performance," he said, offering to quit. Senior Congress leader Ajit Jogi, defeated in the recent polls in Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, immediately rejected the idea, followed by other members who refused to even discuss the matter. The outcome of the twohour discussion was that Sonia was authorised to make structural changes in the party. The failure of Rahul was once again lost in the din raised by leaders who chose to stick with the sinking dynasty. "Sonia and Rahul should remain at the helm as they are the only unifying force in this organisation," says Rajya Sabha MP Vayalar Ravi. But if a party needs a leader only to remain a cohesive unit, the chances of it regaining lost ground look rather bleak.

Though Congress continues to bet on Rahul as its future, the big question is: With him in charge, will the party remain relevant? "If he can't step ahead, he should step aside at least for some time," says a senior Congress leader, speaking strictly off the record.

THE FAILED LEADER

Several Congress leaders feel the time has come for the party to stop rewarding Rahul for every failure, and even look at life without him. But who will bell the cat? And, as former Punjab CM Amarinder Singh asks, what options do they have? "Mrs Gandhi is number one.

After that, there is Rahul. Who can be number three?" says the leader who defeated BJP's Arun Jaitley in Amritsar to give the party one of its few moments of joy. "I believe it's in Congress's interests to keep them there."

When Rahul entered politics in 2004, he was seen as the heir apparent, the knight in shining armour who would introduce structural reforms and modernise the party. But over the years, he has surrounded himself with a group of advisers who are far removed from ground realities. People such as policy strategist Mohan Gopal, former environment minister Jairam Ramesh and party General Secretary Madhusudan Mistry created a utopia for Rahul, where everything worked the way he wanted. The moment when everything could have changed for Rahul was when Congress came back to power in 2009 and Manmohan asked him to join the Cabinet. Rahul could have stepped forward and gained administrative experience but he was interested only in power without responsibility. He excused himself to work for the party.

In between, he registered his presence occasionally, through his support for the farmers' agitation in Bhatta-Parsaul village of Uttar Pradesh in May 2011 and a speech in favour of the Lokpal Bill in Parliament in August that year. His only big push was during the 2012 Assembly polls in Uttar Pradesh, where he campaigned extensively and aggressively. But the party's tally rose by a meagre six seats from 22 to 28 in the 403-member House. He accepted the blame but the Congress would hear none of it.

In December 2012, when Delhi was up in arms after the December 16 gang rape, such was Rahul's disconnect with India that he refused to meet the crowds. It led to the popular slogan: 'Saare yuva yahan hain, Rahul Gandhi kahan hai? (All the youngsters are here, where is Rahul Gandhi?)'. His projected image of a youth icon got a severe beating due to his inability to fight on the street.

Even then party leaders made him Congress vice-president in January, 2013. Rahul accepted this new role with much fanfare and Congressmen believed everything would change now. With 15 months left for the 2014 General Elections, his role was to rejuvenate the party cadres and make them battleready.

But he started an era of experiments with no bearing on the forthcoming polls. He held several meetings with the state Congress units, and reshuffled the organisational structure on his whims and fancies. His vice-presidentship became a pilot project that dabbled in the Youth Congress, and in the media and social media committees.

The entire process left senior leaders cut off from the changing party structure, while his new team of suave Oxford-educated data analysts took over. "It's good to have people who are good at statistics and analysis, but they should not be allowed to take strategic decisions," says former Congress MP Milind Deora, who lost from South Mumbai. "A political party cannot be an NGO. It's fine to have people with degrees from the best colleges, but if they don't have a grassroots connect, they cannot be decision-makers. We must get rid of them," adds RPN Singh, former Union minister and Congress leader, who lost from Kushinagar. Rahul's advisers built him up as a warrior prince who had vowed to fight injustice and was different from the rest of the party. He took their advice to discredit his own government in September 2013, when he rubbished the ordinance to protect convicted lawmakers after it had been cleared by the Cabinet.

A jagged Journey
What further complicated matters was Rahul's blurred vision for new India. Was India a beehive or an elephant, as he said in his CII speech in April 2013? Was it necessary to understand Jupiter's escape velocity to analyse Dalit uplift, as he theorised at Vigyan Bhavan, Delhi, last October? Was poverty a burden, a menace, or just a "state of mind", as he pointed out in Allahabad in August 2013? All of Rahul's frequent verbal blunders are blamed on his team of ideologues.

On May 12, in a meeting of senior Congress leaders at 10, Janpath, just after the last phase of polls was over, senior leaders P. Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal singled out the communication department led by Ajay Maken for the bad press the party had received. The next day, party spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit sent a written complaint to Sonia against Maken, saying he was rarely called to brief the media on behalf of the party.

There is widespread anger among the leaders against Team Rahul, which worked on everything from policy initiatives to campaign planning to ticket distribution. Family loyalists such as Kamal Nath, Janardan Dwivedi and Digvijaya Singh found no favour with the new team. Some, like former Uttar Pradesh Congress chief Jagdambika Pal, got frustrated and joined BJP. "Congress has become the training ground for Rahul Gandhi and his team. The country cannot wait for someone to complete his training and then lead," Pal said in Faizabad in March.

THE MODI CONTRAST

Standing opposite Rahul was a BJP leader who never shunned responsibility. In comparison with Narendra Modi, Rahul was a novice with no promise and work experience. Modi had a clear message of growth and fulfilling aspirations, while Rahul kept speaking about welfare freebies and a hunger-free India.

"Congress represented continuity of the obvious while Modi represented hope," says sociologist Dipankar Gupta of Shiv Nadar University in UP. "Rahul considers today's India to be the India of the 1970s when Indira Gandhi gave the slogan 'Garibi Hatao (Remove Poverty)'.

He hasn't recognised the changes in society. He set lower social markers than Modi, who talked about a respectable life for all," adds Dalit ideologue Chandrabhan Prasad. Modi, 63, had far greater appeal with the youth than Rahul, 43. Even Congress leaders admit the success of Modi as a campaigner.

"From 3D to internet to LED screens, Modi used technology in the best possible way to reach out to people directly," says RPN Singh. Several other leaders are left wondering what might have been had they campaigned with the same fervour as Modi and offered a newer, more updated message.

Historically, several leaders have parted ways whenever the Congress has weakened. In 1988, just before the Lok Sabha elections, V.P. Singh, a minister in Rajiv Gandhi's Cabinet, walked out to form the Janata Dal and fight the Congress. He went on to become the prime minister after the 1989 elections.

Between 1991 and 1996, when P.V. Narasimha Rao was heading the Congress government at the Centre, leaders such as Arjun Singh, N.D. Tiwari, Madhavrao Scindia, Chidambaram and Mamata Banerjee left the party to form their own units. Most of them came back when Sonia took over as party chief in 1998. In 1999, Sharad Pawar, P.A. Sangma and Tariq Anwar revolted against Sonia over her foreign origin to form the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP). The issue later became irrelevant with NCP becoming a Congress ally.

The current group of leaders does not have enough grassroots backing to desert the party and launch separate units. But if they don't see things improving, some would also be forced to move to greener pastures. What worries them most is that the Gandhi family adhesive has lost its vote-catching power, something which had worked in its favour in the past.

THE DISUNITED STATES

Any recovery in Indian politics usually stems from gaining power in the states but Congress units across the country are in complete disarray. The major reason behind this is the systematic emasculation of state leaders through control by the Delhi high command. A move by several Congress leaders to strengthen state leaders and give them more autonomy was openly opposed by R.K. Dhawan in the May 19 CWC meeting, and it seemed apparent that Sonia agreed with him, suggesting that the status quo would remain.

The Congress has to face Assembly elections in Haryana and Maharashtra this October, but chances of it retaining power in either of the states are bleak. There are three factions of leaders in Haryana who are always working to outdo each other. After the December 2013 poll debacle in four states, Rahul sent Ashok Tanwar as state party president in the name of developing new leadership. The Lok Sabha results show a complete erosion of the vote bank in the state, with the vote share dropping drastically by 20 per cent (from 42 per cent to 22 per cent) since the 2009 elections and the number of seats reducing from nine to one. Tanwar himself lost from Sirsa by more than 100,000 votes. "The arithmetic in the Assembly polls will be different. The Lok Sabha polls were fought essentially in Modi's name," says Rohtak MP Deepender Singh Hooda, more with hope than conviction.

His father Bhupinder Singh Hooda is the state's chief minister. In Maharashtra, there hasn't been such a significant drop in the vote share (19.6 per cent to 18.1 per cent), but the party has lost 10 seats and is reduced to a paltry two. The high command had sent Prithviraj Chavan as the chief minister in November 2010 after then chief minister Ashok Chavan's name appeared in the Adarsh housing scam.

Prithviraj has no support base in the state, and a comeback under his leadership seems virtually impossible.

Although Ashok Chavan won the Lok Sabha poll from Nanded, his chances of a bigger role are slim considering the CBI inquiry into the scam is still on.

In Assam, the Congress has been reduced to three seats from seven in 2009, with a 5 per cent dip in the vote share. Even states such as Karnataka, where the party formed a government last year, couldn't add much to the tally despite a 3 per cent rise in vote share (from 37 per cent in 2009 to 40 per cent). Congress got nine out of 28 seats, only three more than 2009. There are states such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu where the party has not been in power for 25 years and is not likely to get revived.

How Rahul lost India
These four states alone account for 201 seats in Lok Sabha, of which the party won just six this time.
And there are states such as Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, where the Congress won only three seats-Jyotiraditya Scindia (Guna), Kamal Nath (Chhindwara) and sitting MLA Tamradhwaj Sahu (Durg).

But the biggest setback came from Andhra Pradesh, which gave the party 33 MPs in 2009. The split caused by Y.S.

Jagan Mohan Reddy and the creation of Telangana backfired, pulling down Congress' vote share by a staggering 27 per cent and costing it 31 seats.

THE SHRINKING APPEAL

The biggest challenge for the Congress is to save itself from extinction. Despite repeated attempts by Rahul to reach out to its traditional voters, the party's support base is rapidly shrinking. Rahul held several town-hall meetings with different sections of society- porters, fishermen, minorities, women self-help groups, street vendors and many others. But the exercise fell flat. "Today even poorest of the poor feel offended if you call them poor. Rahul made this mistake. His intentions might be right but his words were not. The lower strata of society have shown their anger," says Chandrabhan Prasad. The Congress vote share in the Lower Income Group has gone down drastically from 43 per cent in 2009 to 19 per cent in 2014.

Such drastic falls are now forcing allies and potential allies to think about their long-term links with the Congress. On March 14 in Pune, in a closed-door meeting with Congress workers, Rahul urged his party to work for maximum numbers, reducing the need for an alliance with NCP.

He drew a lot of flak for this and NCP leader Sharad Pawar chose not to share the dais with him in Mumbai for an election rally on April 20. On May 17, a day after the Lok Sabha results, Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) leader Mayawati blamed the Congress for the poor performance of her party, saying that supporting the Congress-led UPA was suicidal and her party had paid the price for it. BSP has been reduced to zero seats despite a 4.2 per cent vote share across India.

National Conference (NC) leader and Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has raised the issue of his party's alliance with the Congress. "Many in Congress and NC want this alliance to end. I cannot say anything about the future of the alliance at the moment," he said in a TV interview.

Some Congress leaders also hold Rahul responsible for Lok Janshakti Party leader Ram Vilas Paswan going to NDA. Paswan had met both Sonia and Rahul twice in January this year to talk about an alliance. "Till the last moment, Rahul was not clear whether to forge an alliance with Lalu Yadav and Ram Vilas or with Nitish Kumar," says a senior party leader.

THE ROAD AHEAD

Several Congress leaders are now calling for a restructuring of the party.

"The dead wood must be thrown out immediately," says Rajasthan Congress chief Sachin Pilot. "People with grassroots support and mass contact must reach the top." But they are silent on what the party will do about Rahul, who has failed to be the leader India wanted him to be and Congress needed him to be. It begs the question why senior party leaders did not bring this to the family's notice before the elections, and if they did, was their advice ignored? The Gandhi clan is usually the party's saviour when all else fails. "The Congress is nursed and nurtured by the Nehru-Gandhi family.

Every time there was a split, it regrouped and emerged as the only liberal, democratic, left-of-centre party that represents the idea of India. We lost because our government forgot the art of statecraft," says party General Secretary Digvijaya Singh.

Historian of Jawaharlal Nehru University, Mridula Mukherjee, argues that the party should go back to democratisation, which was at the core of its existence till the 1970s. She points out that there used to be regular elections right from the village level to the president. There was also a shadow government inside the party.

Friday 9 May 2014

अब अमेरिका में भी नजर आएंगे महात्‍मा गांधी!

अब अमेरिका में भी नजर आएंगे महात्‍मा गांधी! जी हां, अमेरिका के टेक्सास राज्य के इरविंग शहर में महात्मा गांधी की एक आदमकद कांस्य प्रतिमा लगायी जाएगी। शहर में रहने वाले भारतीय-अमेरिकी मूल के लोग लंबे समय से इसके लिए प्रयास कर रहे थे और आखिरकार उन्‍हें इसकी इजाजत मिल गई है।

अमेरिका में आंध्र प्रदेश में बनी 7 फुट लंबी और 30 इंच चौड़ी प्रतिमा 6 फुट उंचे आधार पर स्थापित की जाएगी। गांधी की इस प्रतिमा के पीछे ग्रेनाइट की एक दीवार बनायी जाएगी जिसपर गांधी के संदेश अंकित होंगे। साथ ही, इसपर मार्टिन लूथर किंग जूनियर, नेल्सन मंडेला, अल्बर्ट आइंस्टीन, राष्ट्रपति बराक ओबामा और अन्य के उद्धरण भी लिखे होंगे।

इरविंग के थॉमस जेफरसन पार्क में पिछले हफ्ते महात्मा गांधी मेमोरियल प्लाजा का शिलान्यास समारोह हुआ। प्रतिमा की स्थापना के लिए कई भारतीय-अमेरिकी संगठन धन जमा कर रहे थे और सरकारी अधिकारियों को गोलबंद कर रहे थे।

साउथ कैरोलिना की गर्वनर निकी हेले और इरविंग शहर के मेयर बेथ वान ड्यून समारोह में शामिल हुए। कार्यक्रम में 500 से अधिक लोग शामिल हुए थे। समारोह में ह्यूस्टन में भारत के महावाणिज्य दूत पी हरीश भी शामिल हुए।

Sunday 4 May 2014

मजदूरों के हित में कई कानून




मित्रों,
मई दिवस दुनिया भर में मजदूर दिवस के रूप मे मनाया जाता है. अपने देश में भी उस दिन मजदूर दिवस मनाया जाता है और मजदूरों के हितों से जुड़े विषयों पर हर स्तर पर बहस होती है. इस बहस के नतीजे भी आते रहे हैं. मालिक और मजदूर तथा काम लेना वाला और काम करने वाला यह दो वर्ग इस बहस का मुद्दा होता है. अगर उद्योगपतियों को छोड़ दें, तो हर मध्यवर्गीय समाज का हर आदमी दोनों की भूमिका में है. वह खुद कहीं श्रम करता है और फिर उसी आय से किसी का श्रम लेता है यानी किसी से मजदूरी कराता है. यह दुहरा जीवन मजदूर के हर सवाल से जुड़ा है. यह मजदूरों के प्रति हमारे दृष्टिकोण और व्यवहार के दोहरेपन की जड़ है. इसे मिटने की कोशिश सदियों से हर देश, संस्कृति और सभ्यता के इतिहास से जुड़ा रहा है. ऐसा नहीं है कि मजदूरों को लेकर बहस और आंदोलन का कोई सकारात्मक नतीजा नहीं आया. इसके अच्छे नतीजे भी आये हैं. इसे लेकर समाज की सोच को बदलने की बड़ी पहल हुई है. संविधान और कानून में मजदूरों को जगह मिली है. मजदूरों को लेकर कई कानून बने हैं. कई योजनाएं चल रही हैं. इनका लाभ मजदूरों को दिलाने के लिए संस्थागत सरकारी और गैर सामुदायिक प्रयास हो रहे हैं. यह बात दीगर है कि इन कानूनों और योजनाओं का पूरा-पूरा लाभ मजदूर वर्ग को नहीं मिल पाया है. इसकी बड़ी वजह इस वर्ग की जानकारी और प्रतिरोध का अभाव भी है. हम मजदूर दिवस को ध्यान में रख कर इस बार इसी विषय पर बात कर रहे हैं.
आरके नीरद
मजदूर दिवस मनाने की सबसे पुरानी परंपरा अमेरिका की है. भारत में मजदूर दिवस पहली बार 15 जून, 1923  को मनाया गया था. अमेरिका में  मजदूर आंदोलन  यूरोप व अमेरिका में औद्योगिक विकास के साथ शुरू हुआ. आज इसी प्रभाव में यह आंदोलन पूरी दुनिया में फैला हुआ है. 1770 के दशक में अमेरिका की आजादी की लड़ाई और 1860 के गृहयुद्ध से भी मजदूर आंदोलन का जुड़ाव रहा. दुनिया में मजदूरों का पहला संगठन इंग्लैंड में बना. बात 18वीं सदी के मध्य काल की है. मजदूर एवं ट्रेंड यूनियन संगठन 19वीं सदी के अंत तक बहुत मजबूत हो गये थे, क्योंकि यूरोप के दूसरे देशों में भी इस प्रकार के संगठन अिस्तत्व में आने शुरू हो गये थे. अमेरिका में भी मजदूर संगठन बन रहे थे. वहां मजदूरों के शुरूआती संगठन 18वीं सदी के अंत में और 19वीं सदी के शुरू में बनने शुरू हुए.
प्रवासी मजदूरों का मांगें ब्योरा

झारखंड और बिहार से हर दिन बड़ी संख्या में मजदूरों का पलायन होता है. ये मजदूर पश्चिम बंगाल, असम, गुजरात, दिल्ली, आदि राज्यों तथा दूसरे स्थानों पर काम करने जाते हैं.  ऐसे मजदूरों का सरकार के पास कोई लेखाजोखा नहीं होता, जबकि अंतरराज्यीय प्रवासी कामगारों के हितों को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए कानून है. कोई भी प्रतिष्ठान पांच या उससे अधिक प्रवासी मजदूर को काम देता है, तो वह अंतरराज्यीय प्रवासी कामगार (रोजगार और सेवा-दशाओं का विनियमन) अधिनियम, 1979 के दायरे में आता है. उसे ऐसे मजदूरों के लिए पासबुक जारी करना है तथा उसे दी जाने वाली सभी सुविधाओं को उसमें अंकित करना है. केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों को यह सुनिश्चित भी करना है. इसके लिए श्रम विभाग के अधिकारी जिम्मेवार बनाये गये हैं. इस कानून को अगर सही-सही लागू कर दिया जाये, तो मजदूरों की कई समस्याओं का आसानी से हल हो सकता है. आप सूचनाधिकार के तहत इस पर पहल कर सकते हैं. आप संबंधित राज्य के श्रम विभाग से वैसे प्रतिष्ठानों, उनमें काम करने वाले अपने राज्य के प्रवासी मजदूरों, उसके पासबुक तथा उन्हें दी जा रही सुविधाओं की जानकारी मांग सकते है.
असंगठित मजूदरों को शोषण से बचाएं

असंगठित क्षेत्र के मजदूर शोषण के सबसे ज्यादा शिकार हैं. इनमें वैसे मजदूर हैं, जिन्हें ठेकेदार ने मकान, सड़क या पुल निर्माण में लगा रखा है. जो मजदूर आपके शहर के दुकानों में काम करते हैं, वे भी शोषण के शिकार हैं, जबकि इन सब के हितों की रक्षा के लिए कानून है, लेकिन श्रम विभाग के अधिकारी उन कानूनों को लागू करने में ईमानदार पहल नहीं करते हैं. आप उन मजदूरों से जुड़ी सूचनाएं मांग सकते हैं. यह सूचना आपके इलाके के श्रम अधिकारी के कार्यालय से प्राप्त होगी. आप श्रम अधिकारी से श्रमिक संबंधी वादों के निबटारे के बारे में भी सूचना मांगें, ताकि मजदूरों के हक को लेकर उनमें सजगता आये.
विशिष्ट उद्योगों से संबंधित कानून

भारत में श्रिमकों से संबंधित 30 से अधिक प्रमुख कानून हैं. ये कानून उद्योगों में श्रिमकों की भर्ती, उनकी सुरक्षा, कल्याण, उनके काम करने के वातावरण, मालिकों का उनके साथ व्यवहार, क्षतिपूर्ति आदि को सुनिश्चित करते हैं. कारखाना और खदान ही नहीं दुकान, भवन निर्माण, बागान आदि में काम करने वाले मजदूरों के हितों के लिए भी कानून हैं.
फैक्टरी अधिनियम 1948

यह अधिनियम कहता है कि ऐसा परिसर जिसमें (1) दस या उससे अधिक कामगार काम करते हों या पिछले बारह महीनों में किसी भी दिन काम कर रहे थे और जिसके किसी भी हिस्से में निर्माण की प्रक्रि या विद्युत-चालित हो अथवा सामान्यत: इस प्रकार की जाती हो, (2) जिसमें भले ही निर्माण प्रक्रि या में बिजली का इस्तेमाल नहीं होता हो, लेकिन उसमें बीस या उससे अधिक कामगार काम करते हों, कारखाना है, लेकिन इसमें खदान अथवा केंद्र सरकार के सशस्त्र बलों से संबंधित इकाई, रेलवे का संचालन करनेवाला शेड, होटल, रेस्तरां अथवा खाने-पीने की जगह शामिल नहीं है. इस कानून को केंद्र सरकार फैक्टरी सलाहकार सेवा एवं श्रम संस्थान महानिदेशालय (डीजीएफएएसएलआइ) तथा  तथा राज्य सरकारें फैकटरी निरीक्षकों के माध्यम से लागू कराती है.
बागान श्रमिक अधिनियम, 1951

इसमें बागान-मजदूरों के कल्याण का प्रावधान है और यह बागानों में काम की दशाओं को तय करता है. इस कानून में बागान शब्द का अर्थ है कोई भी बागान. इसमें कार्यालय, अस्पताल, डिस्पेंसरी, स्कूल और वे सभी परिसर शामिल हैं, जहां इस प्रकार के बागान हैं. भले ही उनका कुछ भी हो. इस अधिनियम का संचालन श्रम मंत्रलय अपने औद्योगिक संबंध प्रभाग के माध्यम से करता है. यह केंद्रीय औद्योगिक संबंध प्रणाली (सीआइआरएम) से निकट संबंध बनाकर काम करता है.
खदान अधिनियम, 1952

इसमें कोयला, धातु व लौह तथा तेल की खदानों में काम करने वाले कामगारों के स्वास्थ्य, सुरक्षा व कल्याण से संबंधित उपायों के प्रावधान किये गये हैं. इस अधिनियम के अनुसार  खदान  शब्द से आशय है ऐसी खुदाई जिसमें खिनजों की खोज या निकासी के उद्देश्य से कोई काम किया गया हो या किया जा रहा हो. इसमें हर तरह की बोरिंग, बोर छिद्र, तेल-कुएं तथा शॉफ्ट, खुली खदानें, कन्वेयर अथवा हवाई रोपवे, प्लेंस, मशीनरी कारखाने, रेलवे, ट्रामवे, स्लाइिडंग, कार्यशालाएं, पावर स्टेशन आदि शामिल हैं. खनन के काम से जुड़े हुए और खनन-क्षेत्र में स्थित या उसके आस-पास के सभी परिसर भी इसके दायरे में आते हैं. इस कानून को श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रलय खदान सुरक्षा महानिदेशालय (डीजीएमएस) के माध्यम से लागू करता है. डीजीएमएस खदानों का निरीक्षण, उनकी जांच, खदानों में विभिन्न पदों पर नियुक्ति के लिए दक्षता परीक्षाओं तथा कामगारों की सुरक्षा के विभिन्न आयामों पर सेमिनार व संगोष्ठियां आयोजित करता है.
ठेका श्रम अधिनियम, 1970

यह कानून उन मजदूरों के रोजगार, कल्याण और सुरक्षा से संबंधित है, जो ठेकेदार के लिए काम करते हैं. ठेका श्रम का मतलब है किसी ठेकेदार द्वारा कामगारों को उपयोगकर्ता उद्यम के लिए रखा जाना. ये कामगार सामान्यत: कृषि, बागवानी, निर्माण उद्योग, बंदरगाहों और गोदियों, तेल-क्षेत्रों, फैक्टरियों, रेलवे, जहाजरानी, एयरलाइंस, सड़क परिवहन आदि में लगाये जाते हैं. इस कानून को केंद्र और राज्य सरकार दोनों अपने-अपने अधिकार क्षेत्र में संचालित करती हैं. रेलवे, बैंक, खदानें आदि केंद्र सरकार के क्षेत्रिधकार में आते हैं. वहीं राज्य में स्थापित  इकाइयां राज्य सरकार के क्षेत्रिधकार में. केन्द्र के मामले में केंद्रीय औद्योगिक संबंध प्रणाली (सीआइआरएम) को तथा राज्य में श्रम विभाग के अधिकारियों को यह जिम्मेदारी दी गयी है कि वे इस कानून और इसके नियमों को लागू करें.



गांवों के विकास पर अरबों का सालाना खर्च


मित्रों,
केंद्र सरकार हो या राज्य सरकार, ग्रामीण विकास पर सब का जोर है. गांवों के विकास से ही देश का विकास संभव है, यह सभी जानते हैं. देश की 70 प्रतिशत आबादी गांवों में रहती है, यह सच भी सब को पता है. जाहिर है कि विकास के सवाल पर जब भी बात होगी, गांव उसका सबसे बड़ा विषय होगा. आजादी से अब तक गांवों के विकास के लिए सरकार ने अनेक योजनाएं बनायीं. हर साल कई सौ करोड़ रुपये गांवों के विकास के लिए दिये गये. वर्ष 2013-14 के केंद्रीय बजट में ग्रामीण विकास के लिए 80,194 करोड़ रुपये आवंटित किये गये थे. केंद्रीय ग्रामीण विकास मंत्रलय ने 2014-15 के अंतरिम बजट में इसे बढ़ा कर 82202 करोड़ किया है. ग्रामीण विकास से जुड़े पेयजल एवं स्वच्छता, पंचायती राज, स्वास्थ्य एवं परिवार कल्याण, महिला एवं बाल विकास, सामाजिक न्याय एवं अधिकारिता, आवास एवं गरीबी उन्मूलन, जनजातीय कार्य तथा अल्पसंख्यक कल्याण इन आठ मंत्रलयों का बजट 97,805 करोड़ का है. कृषि और मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रलय के के भी अपने बजट हैं, जो अरबों में हैं. इनका भी बड़ा हिस्सा गांवों में खर्च होने हैं. राज्य के मामले में ग्रामीण कार्य विभाग है, जो केंद्र और राज्य सरकार की गांवों के विकास से जुड़ी योजनाओं का संचालन करता है. इसके पास करीब 21 ऐसी योजनाएं हैं.  ये योजनाएं योजना एवं गैर योजना दोनों मद की हैं. इसके तहत सड़क, पुल-पुलिया एवं अन्य आधारभूत संसाधन निर्माण के कार्य किये जाते हैं. सांसद और विधायक को अपने क्षेत्र के विकास के लिए मिलने वाली राशि (एमएलए-एमपी फंड) भी इस विभाग द्वारा खर्च की जाती है. इसका हिसाब-किताब भी इसी विभाग के पास रहता है. इस राशि को जिन बड़ी योजनाओं पर खर्च किया जाता है, उनकी निगरानी के लिए कई स्तर पर समितियां हैं. पंचायती राज संस्थाओं के अस्तित्व में आने के बाद ग्रास रूट पर निगरानी की संवैधानिक संरचना तैयार हुई है. सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 आम आदमी को बड़ी ताकत देता है. कोई भी व्यक्ति महज दस रुपये फीस देकर जानकारी हासिल कर सकता है. अगर वह बीपीएल श्रेणी में आता है, तो उसे बिना शुल्क के सूचना मिलेगी. यानी गांवों के विकास के लिए न तो पैसों की कमी है, न योजनाओं की और निगरानी की. इसके बाद भी गांवों के लिए सरकारी खजाने से निकला पैसा गांवों तक पूरा-पूरा नहीं पहुंच पा रहा है. इस स्थिति को बदलना आम आदमी की बड़ी चुनौती है. इसके लिए सबसे बड़ा अधिकार जानकारी है. हम इस अंक में सरकार की उन बड़ी योजनाओं के बारे में जानकारी दे रहे हैं, जो ग्रामीण विकास के लिए अहम हैं और जिन पर ज्यादा राशि खर्च को रही है.

आरके नीरद

प्रधानमंत्री ग्रामीण सड़क योजना के तहत हर गांव को सड़क से जोड़ने की कोशिश है, ताकि वहां विकास के संसाधन बढ़ें. इस योजना के लिए केंद्र सरकार ने राज्यों को भरपूर आवंटन दिया है. इस साल के अंतरिम बजट में केंद्र सरकार ने  1387.40 करोड़ रुपये का प्रावधान किया है. यह शत-प्रतिशत केंद्र प्रायोजित योजना है. इसकी शुरुआत  25 दिसंबर, 2000 को हुई थी. इस योजना का मुख्य उद्देश्य ग्रामीण इलाकों में 500 या इससे अधिक आबादी वाले सड़क संपर्क से वंचित गांवों को बारहमासी सड़कों से जोड़ना है. भारत निर्माण के अंतर्गत वर्ष 2009 तक समयबद्ध तरीके से मैदानी क्षेत्रों में 1000 से ज्यादा जनसंख्या वाले आबाद क्षेत्रों को जोड़ा जा रहा है.
भारत सरकार ने ग्रामीण सड़कोंको भारत निर्माण के छह घटकों में से एक घटक बनाया है. इसमें मैदानी क्षेत्रों में 1000 और इससे अधिक जनसंख्या तथा पर्वतीय एवं जनजातीय क्षेत्रों में 500 एवं इससे अधिक जनसंख्या वाले वैसे गांवों और गांव समूहों को बारहमासी सड़क उपलब्ध कराने का लक्ष्य है, जो सड़क से जुड़े नहीं हैं. वर्ष 2013-14 के बजट में इस योजना के तहत 21,700 करोड़ रुपये आवंटित किये गये. वर्ष 2014-15 के अंतरिम बजट में सड़क निर्माण के लिए  1387.40 करोड़ रुपये का प्रावधान किया है.

महात्मा गांधी राष्ट्रीय ग्रामीण रोजगार गारंटी अधिनियम

राष्ट्रीय रोजगार गारंटी योजना शुरुआत प्रधानमंत्री डॉ मनमोहन सिंह ने दो फरवरी, 2006 को आंध्र प्रदेश के अनंतपुर जिले से की थी. यह गांवों के लोगों की बेरोजगारी, भूख और गरीबी को दूर करने के उद्देश्य से शुरू की गयी एक महत्वाकांक्षी योजना है.  पहले चरण में वर्ष 2006-07 के दौरान देश के 27 राज्यों के 200 चुनिंदा जिलों में इस योजना को लागू किया गया था.  इसमें सबसे अधिक 23 जिले बिहार के थे. पहले चरण के लिए चुने गये 200 जिलों में 150 वैसे जिले शामिल थे, जहां काम के बदले अनाज योजनाका इस योजना में विलय किया गया.  एक अप्रैल, 2008 से इस योजना को पूरे देश में लागू किया गया.
इस योजना के तहत ग्रामीण क्षेत्र के हर परिवार के एक सदस्य को साल में कम-से-कम 100 दिन अकुशल श्रम वाले रोजगार की गारंटी दी गयी है. यानी एक वित्तीय वर्ष में हर परिवार को 100 दिनों का रोजगार मिलता है, जिसे परिवार के वयस्क सदस्य आपस में बांट सकते हैं. शुरू में इसके तहत जो मजदूरी दी जाती थी, वह खेतिहर मजदूर को मिलने वाली मजदूरी के आधार पर तय  थी. यानी किसी को एक दिन में साठ रुपये से कम नहीं मिलते थे. वर्ष 2011-12 में वास्तविक मजदूरी दर को बढ़ा कर 120 रुपये प्रतिदिन कर दिया गया है. बाद में इस योजना का नामकरण मनरेगा (महात्मा गांधी राष्ट्रीय ग्रामीण रोजगार गारंटी अधिनियम) किया गया. केंद्रीय ग्रामीण विकास विभाग की रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक वर्ष 2011-12 में 19 जनवरी, 2012 तक 3.80 करोड़ परिवारों को रोजगार उपलब्ध कराये गये और 122.37 करोड़ श्रम दिवस रोजगार का सृजन किया गया. इनमें से 60.45 करोड़ महिला, 27.27 करोड़ अनुसूचित जाति तथा 20.97 करोड़ अनुसूचित जनजाति के लिए थे. वर्ष 2012-13 के बजट में 33,000 करोड़ रुपये का आवंटन इस योजना के तहत किया गया था तथा वर्ष 2013-14 के लिए 33,000 करोड़.

ऐसे करें सूचनाधिकार का इस्तेमाल

अगर आप सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के तहत इन योजनाओं से जुड़ी सूचनाएं प्राप्त करना चाहते हैं, इस विभाग के जन सूचना पदाधिकारी को, जो राज्य मुख्यालय से जिला मुख्यालय तक में नामित हैं, दस रुपया सूचना शुल्क के साथ आवेदन दे सकते हैं. यह शुल्क आप कार्यालय में नगद जमा कर उसकी रसीद ले सकते हैं अथवा पोस्टल ऑर्डर, बैंकर्स चेक, डिमांड ड्राफ्ट या नन जुडिशियल स्टांप के रुप में भी यह राशि जमा करा सकते हैं. अगर आप बीपीएल सूची में आते हैं, तो आपको कोई शुल्क नहीं देना है. इसके बदले अपने आवेदन में इस बात का उल्लेख करना होगा कि आप बीपीएल परिवार से आते हैं तथा बीपीएल कार्ड की फोटो कॉपी आवेदन के साथ लगानी होगी. आपका आवेदन मिलने के 30 दिनों के अंदर अगर आपको सूचना नहीं दी जाती है या अधूरी अथवा भ्रामक सूचना ुदी जाती है, तो आप उसी विभाग में प्रथम अपील दायर कर सकतें हैं. प्रथम अपील को सामान्यत: 30 दिनों में और विशेष परिस्थिति में 45 दिनों में निबटाया जाना है. ऐसा नहीं होने पर राज्य सूचना आयोग में आप दूसरी अपील दायर करें.
इस सदी में ग्रामीण जीवन में सुधार लाने के लिए केंद्र सरकार ने रोजगार, स्वास्थ्य, शिक्षा, खाद्य सुरक्षा और लड़कियों के से जुड़ी करीब दो दर्जन योजनाएं शुरू की हैं. इन योजनाओं पर सरकार के अब तक करोड़ों रुपये खर्च हुए हैं. यह बात दीगर है कि इनका कितना लाभ मिला, इसे लेकर सरकार के दावे और जमीनी हकीकत पर बहस की पूरी गुंजाइश अब भी है.

रोजगार योजना

स्वर्ण जयंती ग्राम स्वरोजगार योजना
सम्पूर्ण ग्रामीण रोजगार योजना
स्वर्ण जयंती शहरी रोजगार योजना
नरेगा राष्ट्रीय ग्रामीण रोजगार गारंटी अधिनियम
प्रधानमंत्री रोजगार योजना
स्वास्थ्य योजना
प्रधानमंत्री स्वास्थ्य सुरक्षा योजना
राष्ट्रीय ग्रामीण स्वास्थ्य मिशन
मान्यता प्राप्त सामाजिक स्वास्थ्य कार्यकर्ता
राष्ट्रीय ग्रामीण आजीविका मिशन
राष्ट्रीय स्वास्थ्य बीमा योजना
आम आदमी बीमा योजना (ए ए बी वाई)
शिक्षा अभियान
सर्व शिक्षा अभियान
किशोर वैज्ञानिक प्रोत्साहन योजना
मध्याह्न भोजन योजना
राष्ट्रीय माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान
राष्ट्रीय साक्षरता मिशन कार्यक्रम
होस्टल योजना
खाद्य सुरक्षा
राष्ट्रीय खाद्य सुरक्षा अधिनियम
अंत्योदय योजना

अन्नपूर्णा योजना